I'm working now at my office and get bored.. and I remember about one of the world famous scientist..Isaac Newton. He was born on Christmas day 1642.. He was an English Physicist, mathematician, astronomer, natural philosopher, alchemist and theologian.. I admire him because he dedicated his life for science.. Now,enjoy reading guys.. ;)
Gravity
Newtonian Relationships
by Nathaniel Page Stites, M.A./M.S.
What causes objects to fall toward the earth? Why do the planets orbit the sun? What holds galaxies together? If you traveled to another planet, why would your weight change? All of these questions relate to one aspect of physics: gravity. For all of its influence on our daily lives, for all of its control over the cosmos, and for all of our ability to describe and model its effects, we do not understand the actual mechanisms of gravitational force. Of the four fundamental forces identified by physicists – strong nuclear, electroweak, electrostatic, and gravitational – the gravitational force is the least understood. Physicists today strive toward a "Grand Unified Theory," wherein all four of these forces are united into one physical model that describes the behavior of everything in the universe. At this point in time, the gravitational force is the troublesome one, the force that resists unification. In spite of the mystery behind the mechanisms of gravity, physicists have been able to describe the behavior of objects under the influence of gravity quite thoroughly. Isaac Newton, a seventeenth into eighteenth century English scientist and mathematician (among other things), was the first person to propose a mathematical model to describe the gravitational attraction between objects. Albert Einstein built upon this model in the twentieth century and devised a more complete description of gravity in his theory of general relativity. In this module, we will explore Newton’s description of gravity and some of the experimental confirmations of his theory that came many years after he proposed his original idea.
The Apple
|
Concept simulation - Reenacts Galileo's experiment of two different objects falling at the same rate.
(Flash required)
The Planets
Early conceptions of the universe were "geocentric" – they placed the earth at the center of the universe and had the planets and stars move around the earth. The Ptolemaic Model of the universe dominated scientific thought for many centuries, until the work of such careful astronomers as Tycho Brahe, Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, and Johannes Kepler supplanted this view of the cosmos. The “Copernican Revolution” placed the sun at the center of the solar system and the planets, including earth, in orbit around the sun. This major shift in perception laid the foundation for Isaac Newton to begin thinking about gravitation as it related to the motions of the planets.Figure 1: The Solar System |
An early unification theory
Just as physicists today are searching for ways to unify the fundamental forces, Isaac Newton also sought to unify two seemingly disparate phenomena: the motion of objects falling toward the earth and the motion of the planets orbiting the sun. Isaac Newton’s breakthrough was not that apples fall to the earth because of gravity; it was that the planets are constantly falling toward the sun for exactly the same reason: gravity! Newton built upon the work of early astronomers, in particular Johannes Kepler, who in 1596 and 1619 published his laws of planetary motion. One of Kepler's central observations was that the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun. Newton expanded Kepler’s description of planetary motion into a theory of gravitation.Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation
The essential feature of Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation is that the force of gravity between two objects is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Such a connection is known as an “inverse square” relationship. Newton derived this relationship from Kepler’s assertion that the planets follow elliptical orbits. To understand this, consider the light radiating from the surface of the sun. The light has some intensity at the surface of the sun. As the light travels away from the sun, its intensity diminishes. The intensity of the light at any distance away from the sun equals the strength of the source divided by the surface area of a sphere surrounding the sun at that radius.As the distance away from the sun (r) doubles, the area of the sphere surrounding the sun quadruples. Thus, the intensity of the sun’s light depends inversely on the square of the distance away from the sun. Newton envisioned the gravitational force as radiating equally in all directions from a central body, just as sunlight in the previous example. Newton recognized that his gravitational model must take the form of an inverse square relationship. Such a model predicts that the orbits of objects around a central body will be conic sections, and years of astronomical observations have borne this out. Although this idea is most commonly attributed to Isaac Newton, the English mathematician Robert Hooke claimed that he originated the idea of the inverse square relationship. Nonetheless, Newton eventually published his theory of gravitation and became famous as a result.
The relationship that Newton came up with looks like this:
Figure 2: Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation |
Measuring the Mass of the Earth: The Cavendish Experiment
In 1797 and 1798 Henry Cavendish set out to confirm Newton's theory and to determine the constant of proportionality in Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. His ingenious experiment, based on the work of John Michell, was successful on both fronts. To accomplish this, Cavendish created a "torsion balance," which consisted of two masses at either end of a bar that was suspended from the ceiling by a thin wire (see Figure 3).Figure 3: The Torsion Balance, devised by Michell and Cavendish to determine the constant of proportionality in Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. |
Figure 4: Gravitational Constant |
Therefore, setting this equation equal to Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation described above, Cavendish found:
Figure 5: Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation as used by Cavendish to determine the mass of the Earth. |
Figure 6: Results of Cavendish's calculation for the mass of the Earth. |
We can also use this relationship to calculate the force of attraction between two people across a room. To do this, we simply need to use Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation with Cavendish’s gravitational constant. Assume the two people have masses of 75 and 100 kilograms, respectively, and that they are 5 meters apart. The force of gravitation between them is:
Figure 7: Gravitational attraction between two people. |
Conclusion
Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation grew in importance as scientists realized its utility in predicting the orbits of the planets and other bodies in space. In 1705, Sir Edmund Halley, after studying comets in great detail, predicted correctly that the famous comet of 1682 would return 76 years later, in December of 1758. Halley had used Newton’s Law to predict the behavior of the comet orbiting the sun. With the advent of Cavendish’s accurate value for the gravitational constant, scientists were able to use Newton’s law for even more purposes. In 1845, John Couch Adams and Urbain Le Verrier predicted the existence of a new, yet unseen, planet based on small discrepancies between predictions for and observations of the position of Uranus. In 1846, the German astronomer Johann Galle confirmed their predictions and officially discovered the new planet, Neptune.While Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation remains very useful today, Albert Einstein demonstrated in 1915 that the law was only approximately correct, and that it fails to work when gravitation becomes extremely strong. Nonetheless, Newton’s gravitational constant plays an important role in Einstein’s alternative to Newton’s Law, the Theory of General Relativity. The value of G has been the subject of great debate even in recent years, and scientists are still struggling to determine a very accurate value for this most elusive of fundamental physical constants.
source : http://www.visionlearning.com/library/module_viewer.php?mid=118
No comments:
Post a Comment